Adding Value to the Facility Acquisition Process (Federal by Authored by Ralph S. Spillinger in conjunction with the PDF

By Authored by Ralph S. Spillinger in conjunction with the Federal Facilities Council, Standing Committee on Organizational Performance and Metrics, National Research Council

ISBN-10: 0309068940

ISBN-13: 9780309068949

ISBN-10: 0309515092

ISBN-13: 9780309515092

Show description

Read Online or Download Adding Value to the Facility Acquisition Process (Federal Facilities Council technical report) PDF

Similar technical books

New PDF release: The ACS Style Guide: A Manual for Authors and Editors

The fundamental table reference for authors, editors, and publishers of medical learn, the ACS sort advisor is a whole stylistic guide. subject matters comprise grammar, kind, utilization, illustrations, tables, lists, and devices of degree, in addition to the conventions utilized in chemistry. It additionally covers quite a few comparable themes, from peer evaluation and copyrights to oral shows and the ACS moral directions for e-book.

Read e-book online Hedging in Scientific Research Articles PDF

Hedging is vital to educational writing because it expresses chance instead of simple task and collegiality instead of presumption. it's one potential through which writers deal with this pragmatic size of discourse and this article makes an attempt to make clear using hedging in released clinical papers. the writer argues that: hedges are hired to beat the inherent negatability of statements and achieve the reader's popularity of a data declare; hedges can emphasize an orientation to both the proposition or the reader; the epistemic and affective capabilities of hedges are frequently conveyed concurrently and that this indeterminacy prevents the formation of discrete descriptive different types; and hedging in scientifc learn writing is the fabricated from informational, rhetorical and private offerings and can't be absolutely understood in insolation from its social and institutional contexts.

Extra resources for Adding Value to the Facility Acquisition Process (Federal Facilities Council technical report)

Sample text

About 10–15 percent of the designs are accomplished with in-house staff. The remainder of the designs are awarded to A/E firms, some of which are selected on a case-by-case basis and some are awarded as a task order on an ID/IQ-type contract. In these cases, DESIGN REVIEW PRACTICES IN FEDERAL AGENCIES 33 NAVFAC manages the design contract, manages the interface between the A/E and the end user, and looks out for the Navy’s overarching interests, including special criteria and codes. Following the federal, DoD, and Navy budgets, NAVFAC has been steadily downsizing over the past five years to match workload declines and to take advantage of efficiencies that have been recently developed: • ID/IQ multiyear A/E contracts (as noted above); • task order contracts that greatly simplify the contracting process; • extensive use of design-build contracts—particularly a two-phase method of selecting a few top-quality contractors based on merit and then selecting from among them based on proposals and price; • PC-based productivity tools focused on one-time data entry and paperless acquisition; • An up-front, intense design “charrette” to obtain agreement among all stakeholders at the beginning of the design process to effectively transition from planning to design.

NASA has responded to this staff downsizing change in three ways: • Greater use of outsourcing for A/E services, particularly through multiyear engineering support service contracts which allow flexible tasking in areas of engineering studies, preliminary or developmental engineering, and production of construction contract plans and specifications. • Reengineering its facility engineering processes to improve their efficiency and effectiveness so that more work can be successfully accomplished by fewer staff.

S. S. S. Department of Veterans Affairs Following is a summary and analysis of questionnaires returned from each of the above-listed nine agencies. In those cases in which responses were received from multiple field activities associated with a single agency, the responding field activities have also been identified. Each analysis begins with a description of the agency’s current environment and addresses four questions: • • • • What is the scope of the agency’s facilities engineering activity?

Download PDF sample

Adding Value to the Facility Acquisition Process (Federal Facilities Council technical report) by Authored by Ralph S. Spillinger in conjunction with the Federal Facilities Council, Standing Committee on Organizational Performance and Metrics, National Research Council


by Thomas
4.1

Rated 4.69 of 5 – based on 24 votes